Talk:SolidWorks
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Companies | ||||||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SolidWorks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Noun
Is the use of the noun SolidWorks old now? (It will never be old) Everywhere in DSS reference, it is now SOLIDWORKS isn't it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.152.143 (talk) 11:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Agree, it's now SOLIDWORKS isn't it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.152.143 (talk • contribs) 12:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- And it's irrelevant. Per MOS:TRADEMARK, we don't show it as all caps in articles. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:53, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
This is a terrible article. Who cares who the Executive VP of 3DExperience Works" is? The whole article needs re-writing. Some of the links go to websites that look like they are from the 1990s. And why do we need a huge chart with the exact date of every historical release?
I've done quite a bit of work to update this "terrible article" with newer, more relevant links, and actual information on the software (both browser and cloud based). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geekybiz (talk • contribs) 18:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)