Talk:Socialist Unity Network

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Socialism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Politics of the United Kingdom This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

there is no copyright infringment as i wrote the original text and permission is therefore given j.jepps

Rather than delete this comment, perhaps Jim Jepps could be reached through the Socialist Unity Network's website. http://www.socialistunitynetwork.co.uk. He appears to be the webmaster. NPOV can be established from this article. DJ Silverfish 14:04, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I think in general this article does need tidying up and could be a bit more neutral in its style. I will try and do some work on it here. No offence meant Jim! --NHSavage 23:58, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I consder this article wikified and now NPOV. IT could do with more work but it is no longer in the categoryies of wikify or npov

This group has no meaningful public profile, a tiny membership base, and is in any case little more than a website. Why is this article here? 90.205.92.20 (talk) 06:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]