Talk:Single-point urban interchange
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Single-point urban interchange article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
single point urban interchange
Reference 6 relates to a tight diamond interchange. Better to compare to a diverging diamond interchange that has only two phase signals. This then has 50% more capacity than a single point interchange because of fewer phases, and because of shorter clearance distances that waste time and cause blockages when combined with freeway ramp metering. It also has 50% fewer crashes. It follows that diverging diamond interchanges have more capacity and safety and it is hard to see where a single point interchange would have any advantage. John cleeland (talk) 23:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)