This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 16:30, August 7, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
@LainEverliving: – I see you've been working extensively with this article. You'll notice that I removed a number of citations, all to the non-credible ANN Encyclopedia, but I got to reading the article, and I'd like to say your style and writing is very-well done, as well as the organization, but there seems to be a much heavier emphasis on the studio's individual productions and the awards those productions received than is necessary. There's too much in the prose regarding these individual works themselves, and not enough about how they're important to Saru's cultural, historical, or creator-related identity. In that way, it feels like the article is more about these works, rather than the studio itself; in other words, the article stagnates into what I would call being "off-topic." Of course, it's fine to mention all of these works in the prose somewhere, if you'd like, but the amount of content about them, some with little to do with the areas I've mentioned, feel very off-topic. I was wondering if you would be willing to try cleaning that up; it would make for a more Saru-centralized article, which is the goal, as I see it. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 08:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Requested move 15 August 2021
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
NAZ (studio) → Naz (studio) — Per MOS:TMRULES and WP:TITLECAPS, all caps titles should only be used in place of an abbreviation (like MAPPA) or if that is how it is pronounced (like SynergySP), however, neither of those are the case for these studios, so they should not be in all caps. LainEverliving previously moved this page to the all caps title stating that it is how the studio stylized it. However, how the studio styles it is irrelevant in the naming conventions. Link20XX (talk) 18:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.