Talk:Royal Athletic Park
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Capacity ?
I've been to Royal Athletic Park several times and I believe that the capacity is less than 1000 in typical configurations. I do not believe that the 9200 capacity is accurate. Perhaps 920? I don't have any inside knowledge, but it is clear that capacity is less than 9000. Ensslen 01:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- You're right that it seems high. It came from the city's page, and I think refers to the 'convention' or 'open field' capacity (like for beer fest). I actually work so once all of the world cup things are done this summer, I'll get the post-world cup SEATING capacity. We have had events that go up above 3,000 people, but they have been pretty tightly packed into there. NByz 03:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- I have updated its capacity. The Web site of the city lists its permanent capacity as 4247. So unless we can come up with a "better" reference that is all we have. Dmgerman 19:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Royal Athletic Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071217001513/http://www.victoria.ca/common/pdfs/leisure_facilities_rap_map.pdf to http://www.victoria.ca/common/pdfs/leisure_facilities_rap_map.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Royal Athletic Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110510122957/http://www.victoriaunited.com:80/ourclub.php?page=stadium to http://www.victoriaunited.com/ourclub.php?page=stadium
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110510122957/http://www.victoriaunited.com:80/ourclub.php?page=stadium to http://www.victoriaunited.com/ourclub.php?page=stadium
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:14, 10 March 2016 (UTC)