Talk:Richard Grusin

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Wisconsin Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <Grusin (along with co-author Jay David Bolter, who has his own Wiki page) is responsible for the new media theory of Remediation, which is a pretty big deal to media scholars and the article clearly explains the book the theory originated in and why it's important. There are plenty of other new media scholars with their own Wiki pages, so I guess I'm just confused as to why Grusin can't have one.>. — PND1983 (talk) 18:38, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <replace these words with your reason>. — sorry, Prof. Grusin easily meets the qualifications for notability (academic) with his books, head of research center, etc. etc. etc. --Buridan (talk) 19:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]