Talk:Relevant cost

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Garrison et al. states that sunk costs are always irrelevant in decision making. This makes sense, and assuming that one knows that a cost has occurred in the past, this would be a case of being able to make an a priori determination that the cost is irrelevant for any decision that will occur now or in the future. Takayuki I (talk) 23:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting article. I think government ministers should read it. Biscuittin (talk) 19:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]