Talk:Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Abella

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The name of this (and similar) pages should be changed. Canadian courts don't give "opinions," they give reasons. 24.68.239.185 09:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to change it as long as you can point to some sources or examples of this. Admittedly, I was likely just following the US formatting in their comparable articles. --PullUpYourSocks 03:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok looks like the answer was right under my nose the whole time. If one looks at the headnote of any SCC judgment it lists the "reasons for judgment" not opinions. [1] --PullUpYourSocks 02:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]