Talk:Ravindra Jadeja/GA1
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Harrias (talk · contribs) 12:24, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The article suffers from generally poor prose, and there is an inconsistent use of abbreviations for scores and bowling performances throughout the article. The article focusses too much on these statistics, without relevant commentary on his actual performances. The article is mostly well-referenced, but there are occasions on which far too many references are provided (are five really needed for the fact he was called "Sri Sri Pandit Sir Lord Ravindra Jadeja" by Dhoni?) On the other hand, there are some facts included without references, and those references that are provided are inconsistent and incomplete. The tables at the bottom do not meet MOS guidelines on accessibility and sortability. Harrias talk 12:24, 29 September 2013 (UTC)