Talk:Ramesh Solanki
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should I put this page under deletion.
Here coz got a notification that some links on this page to a page created by me. Should we delete this page coz apart from petty act and a minor fame this person is not that notable. Edward Zigma (talk) 03:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Edward Zigma: that depends on you. Person passes WP:GNG and WP:NPOL, has received coverages in multiple, independent and reliable sources. Before nomination, I will just refer you to read WP:DISRUPTSIGNS and WP:Disruptive user. -- Harshil want to talk? 03:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Harshil169 (talk · contribs)No need to cite unnecessary policies here. This is a discussion and I am sticking it with my arguement that I don't think this person passes that much notability to have a page at present. Having name in certain headline isn't a criteria for being notable I guess.Edward Zigma (talk) 04:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Edward Zigma: I have no energy or intention to let you explain. You have problem with my every contributions, you are filling SPI and AE reports against me, and now you have problem with citation of policies which passes for the subject. I think Bbb23 can explain you more in details. You are allowed to go for deletion. -- Harshil want to talk? 05:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Harshil169 (talk · contribs)No need to cite unnecessary policies here. This is a discussion and I am sticking it with my arguement that I don't think this person passes that much notability to have a page at present. Having name in certain headline isn't a criteria for being notable I guess.Edward Zigma (talk) 04:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Edward Zigma: that depends on you. Person passes WP:GNG and WP:NPOL, has received coverages in multiple, independent and reliable sources. Before nomination, I will just refer you to read WP:DISRUPTSIGNS and WP:Disruptive user. -- Harshil want to talk? 03:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Yes go ahead he is not eligible for this criteria. So kindly delete his Wikipedia page Medtiya (talk) 17:25, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
please delete per Wikipedia:G11
please delete per Wikipedia:G11 Charlieheb (talk) 00:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC)