Talk:Don Muang Royal Thai Air Force Base
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Don Muang Royal Thai Air Force Base article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 11:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- RTAFB Don Muang → Don Muang Royal Thai Air Force Base
- RTAFB Takhli → Takhli Royal Thai Air Force Base
- RTAFB Korat → Korat Royal Thai Air Force Base
- RTAFB Ubon → Ubon Royal Thai Air Force Base
- RTAFB Udorn → Udorn Royal Thai Air Force Base
– Articles were recently renamed from the understandable "Royal Thai Air Force Base" to the obscure abbreviation "RTAFB". This is in violation of WP:ACRONYMTITLE. It is also neither recognizable nor natural per WP:Article titles, since the general reader will have no idea what an RTAFB is. A quick browse through Google Books shows that the abbreviation is not overwhelmingly common, and when used, it is almost always accompanied by the full term at first occurrence. The names also appear in the form "Don Muang RTAFB" rather than "RTAFB Don Muang". Suggest that these articles revert to their former names. 182.52.52.32 (talk) 14:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment why "x RTAFB" instead of "RTAFB x" ordering? If you look a military sites, they are "Fort X", not "X fort", "Camp Y", not "Y camp", "Firebase Z", not "Z firebase"... -- 76.65.128.252 (talk) 02:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support: absolutely no idea what 'RTAFB' as it is not a common title.--Michaela den (talk) 02:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support: A abbreviation is not the official name of the base. Bwmoll3 (talk) 03:05, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support as per nom. The recently-adopted name was not achieved through discussion or consensus that I know of; IMO it doesn't look natural. The long-standing name should be reverted to until a consensus had been made for a wholesale change. Kyteto (talk) 15:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment In response to 76.x, "Camp Y" instead of "Y Camp" depends on naming convention. See Pasir Laba Camp in contrast to the American convention of Camp Humphreys. As to the main issue, this naming convention is used by at least some countries. For example, see CFB Goose Bay, RAF Mount Pleasant. I believe Barksdale Air Force Base may be referred to as Barksdale AFB by those in service too, as an American example. So, should these abbreviations be spelled out in full? Wikipedia:ACRONYMTITLE indicates that it should. Whatever the decision, it should be applied consistently. That being the case, this talk page is probably not the best forum for the discussion. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 16:20, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support per nom - much more clear to have spelt out version. Buckshot06 (talk) 19:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Don Muang Royal Thai Air Force Base. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090130025918/http://home.att.net/~jbaugher/usafserials.html to http://home.att.net/~jbaugher/usafserials.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Don Muang Royal Thai Air Force Base. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080214234149/http://www.scramble.nl/th.htm to http://www.scramble.nl/th.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)