Search results

Results 1 – 20 of 81
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

There is a page named "Talk:RBMK" on Wikipedia

View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  • reactor. -- Andrewa 10:37 20 Jun 2003 (UTC) I was under the belief that RBMK reactors produced "weapons-grade" plutonium. It seems I was wrong. So, what...
    20 KB (2,933 words) - 22:20, 24 April 2024
  • I think this page is inaccurate in a couple of respects. The RBMK is actually capable of using unenriched, natural uranium. However it was designed mainly...
    3 KB (505 words) - 20:07, 1 February 2023
  • removed a substantial amount of text, all of which appears to relate to the RBMK power station reactors, and has no direct relevance to Soviet naval reactors...
    348 bytes (36 words) - 01:56, 12 March 2024
  • of RBMK reactors is also not designed to maintain integrity in the range of pressure specified. If you have a reliable source that states that RBMK reactors...
    74 KB (11,545 words) - 00:30, 8 July 2017
  • this in an article, though. Gah4 (talk) 22:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC) The RBMK page mentions β, linking to this page. More specifically, it mentions the...
    2 KB (264 words) - 02:34, 16 May 2024
  • August 2009 (UTC) Kursk Nuclear Power Plant suggests that Kursk is all of RBMK design, including the cancelled units 5 and 6. And Kursk-II is of VVER. These...
    3 KB (541 words) - 22:30, 13 March 2024
  • 5 (talk) 13:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC) This article repeats the myth that RBMKs have no containment, which has been spread to distinguish "dangerous" Soviet...
    6 KB (790 words) - 11:22, 22 April 2024
  • As far as things go, he was never put on trial, but design flaws in the RBMK reactor were his doing. 212.188.108.151 (talk) 06:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC) Hello...
    2 KB (281 words) - 18:24, 13 February 2024
  • vary throughout the reactor. This is one of the design complications of the RBMK. Operators had to work hard to keep reactivity close to 1 throughout the...
    3 KB (394 words) - 06:04, 31 January 2024
  • Does Magnox have full containment or it is more like in RBMK type reactor? Looks like it doesn't have a secondary containment building: [1] [2] [3] (but...
    12 KB (1,868 words) - 21:11, 10 February 2024
  • soviet report, which sought to hide the fundamental design flaws in the RBMK reactor, which were vying to the be the first to make it blow up. It became...
    11 KB (1,609 words) - 14:38, 7 February 2024
  • rather short. -- Felix König ✉ 11:13, 29 December 2010 (UTC) From Article [RBMK]: The first of these, AM-1 ("Атом Мирный", Atom Mirny, Russian for "peaceful...
    4 KB (480 words) - 20:34, 16 February 2024
  • (talk) 03:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC) Why is, specifically, the RBMK listed under Uses? The RBMK uses lower enrichment that just about any other power reactor...
    13 KB (1,993 words) - 03:52, 5 May 2022
  • 25 October 2007 (UTC) No. This reactor has absolutely NOTHING to do with RBMK reactors of Russia. Reactivity excursions are physically impossible with...
    10 KB (1,398 words) - 15:38, 22 March 2024
  • "containment". See (the updated) RBMK page for a discussion as well as a much more detailed reference. The short version: All RBMK reactors have some containment...
    26 KB (4,149 words) - 09:48, 29 May 2008
  • of reactor type. As an example, the CANDU and RBMK reactors share some features, but because the RBMK has several serious design flaws it is generally...
    127 KB (19,743 words) - 12:51, 6 January 2024
  • clarification, this article shows the Reactor Type of Unit 5 to have been RBMK-1000, but the MKER article suggests that unit 5 is/was to be a MKER reactor...
    3 KB (597 words) - 21:08, 4 February 2024
  • Would you see Encyclopedia Britannica describe the features of say, the RBMK nuclear reactor using this stupid marketing buzzphrase? Changed it to "features"...
    3 KB (420 words) - 19:45, 10 February 2024
  • 13:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC) See §Neutron shield in nuclear reactors and RBMK. Should the "bound water" link here best point to either bound water or water...
    5 KB (731 words) - 02:53, 12 January 2024
  • reactors, erroneously believing that all designs are as dangerous as the RBMK (involved in the Chernobyl accident), when in fact all other designs have...
    22 KB (3,377 words) - 02:17, 31 January 2023
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)