Talk:Quentin Tarantino
![]() | Quentin Tarantino has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 12, 2019. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quentin Tarantino article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 180 days ![]() |
![]() | The Vega Brothers was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on January 23, 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Quentin Tarantino. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Semi-protected edit request on 22 February 2024
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
X=As the page is. Y=Add "author" to the short description and main description. 82.21.83.129 (talk) 15:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done: he is mainly known as a film-maker. M.Bitton (talk) 14:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2024
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
You need to add that he likes feet unironically. This is a travesty that this information is not available here. 24.29.243.127 (talk) 03:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Jamedeus (talk) 04:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
QT Intro
Quentin Tarantino intro includes an uncited qoute: "the single most influential director of his generation”. To date, I have been unable to find this exact quote referenced anywhere. At present, this quote should be tagged [citation needed]. Looking forclarity (talk) 13:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Typically text in the article lead doesn't have inline citations, per MOS:LEADCITE. If you look under the Appraisals section you'll find two citations for the quotation. Ligaturama (talk) 14:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. Looking forclarity (talk) 13:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
suggested rewrite on sentence in the intro
"Tarantino's career, his films have garnered a cult following; as well as critical and commercial success, he has been considered "the single most influential director of his generation"."
this reads very weirdly to me. usually a semicolon placed like this implies that the following subsentence will build off the content before the semicolon, but here it seems to go off in another direction. 216.164.249.213 (talk) 20:59, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
"Identifies as having Cherokee descent"
This language is very pointlessly clunky and strange sounding. You don't "identify as" having Cherokee descent, you just have it, the same as any other race/ethnicity. It stands out as a counterproductive attempt at PC language. It especially stands out in the full sentence, "Tarantino identifies as having Cherokee descent through his mother, who is of Irish descent on her other side; his father is of Italian descent." Cherokee heritage is the only one with the "identifies as" added. It isn't claimed that his mother "identifies as having Irish descent" or his father "identifies as having Italian descent."
Proposed rewrite:
"Tarantino is of Cherokee descent through his mother, who is of Irish descent on her other side; his father is of Italian descent."
Alternatively:
"Tarantino has Cherokee descent through his mother, who is of Irish descent on her other side; his father is of Italian descent."
I wasn't sure which one sounded the most natural. Both sound a lot more natural than "identifies as having Cherokee descent," though. 2601:483:4B80:F480:0:0:0:BF0F (talk) 05:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)