Talk:Q69 and Q100 buses/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 1.02 editor (talk · contribs) 02:54, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article, expect comments soon. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 02:54, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking it up.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 19:05, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Detailed

• There are some cn tags on the article
• the notes mentioned that the Q69 does not operate on late nights but this is already mentioned in the Q69 paragraph in the first section. Change? Also could you add this to the infobox
  • Done. Tdorante10 (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Former Q19A- 'the two services were merged…' are the two services Q19A and Q33A or Q19A and Q69.
  • Clarified, the Q19A and Q33A/Q51 were the two routes. Tdorante10 (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Q100- is it is safe to assume that it is the only limited service along the corridor?
  • Clarified in lead. Tdorante10 (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Not a statuary requirement but is there a map of the route or a route diagram?
  • Done. Tdorante10 (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• could you mention what types of buses is used on the route and passenger numbers in prose?
  • I think over emphasis on the bus models would be trivia/cruft. Tdorante10 (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ok, then what about the passenger numbers? 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 00:10, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• are refs 30&33 the same?

 Done--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 00:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hold

@Kew Gardens 613: I've reviewed the article and have identified some issues that needs to be fixed. You'll have seven days to address these issues. Do leave me a message if you have any queries. Thanks. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 02:40, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Kew Gardens 613 and Tdorante10: there's a cn tag in the history section that needs to be addressed before I can pass the article.

@Kew Gardens 613 and Tdorante10: any progress? 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 04:04, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@1.02 editor: I just hid the sentence for now; I don't think it hurts the article. Tdorante10 (talk) 04:20, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then. Looks good. Passing. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 04:26, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]