Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Talk:Proposition" on Wikipedia
- all propositions implications (because it seemed to me that all propositions should have an inverse)? Elsewhere on the web I found propositions being...6 KB (664 words) - 08:09, 2 May 2024
- Please see the ongoing discussion of this topic at Proposition. BrideOfKripkenstein (talk) 23:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC) this part of article is wrong an...3 KB (290 words) - 18:20, 12 May 2023
- 2021 (UTC) Proposition 2 (disambiguation) → Proposition 2 – Swap the disambiguation page with the current primary topic redirect. "Proposition 2" is a general...3 KB (279 words) - 03:56, 10 October 2021
- I don't think November 15, 2008 anti-Proposition 8 protests was impactful enough to merit an article separate from this – maybe this warrants a few sentences...5 KB (391 words) - 08:13, 10 July 2024
- 18 September 2013 (UTC) Shouldn't the title be changed to "California Proposition 14 (1964)"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doug Shaver (talk •...7 KB (1,019 words) - 04:03, 16 January 2024
- (UTC) Arizona Proposition 200 (2004) → Arizona Proposition 200 Arizona Proposition 107 (2006) → Arizona Proposition 107 Arizona Proposition 207 (2006) →...11 KB (1,328 words) - 07:33, 17 January 2024
- Talk:Arizona_Proposition_200_(2004)#Move? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:54, 31 January 2013 (UTC) Arizona Proposition 102 → Arizona Proposition 102 (2008) – The...9 KB (1,150 words) - 18:50, 17 January 2024
- (talk) 13:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC) "On October 15, 1994, one week after Proposition 187 was passed, more than 70,000 people marched in downtown Los Angeles...56 KB (7,785 words) - 04:17, 8 March 2024
- October 2017 (UTC) This warning appears on "firestarters". "California Proposition 65 Warning The burning of natural firewood, natural gas, manufactured...18 KB (2,560 words) - 16:33, 16 July 2024
- writings made by pro-Gun lobbyists. The entire section is an utterly pro-Proposition screed. One finds when looking at the sources that they come entirely...75 KB (12,139 words) - 00:57, 7 February 2024
- editor has requested for Proposition 2 (disambiguation) to be moved to Proposition 2. Since you had some involvement with Proposition 2 (disambiguation), you...51 KB (7,886 words) - 18:54, 17 January 2024
- freedom of religion, etc. We should probably have a section about why this proposition failed in Arizona, when similar referenda across the country were approved...6 KB (848 words) - 16:56, 17 January 2024
- There are many other Proposition H's that are on the ballot, and a multitude of them in the past. I never here of anyone in San Francisco referring to...2 KB (227 words) - 12:37, 25 February 2024
- move of Proposition 204 to Arizona Proposition 204 (2006) - that would be a classic case of unnecessary precision. If there was another Proposition 204 sufficiently...3 KB (180 words) - 16:56, 17 January 2024
- be aligned as anti-proposition 8 (The Advocate) was the only cited source for reporting details of the campaign of a pro-proposition 8 organisation (LDS)...10 KB (1,458 words) - 10:29, 10 October 2022
- 2008 anti-Proposition 8 protests is about the mass protest marches that took place nationwide across the US against the passage of the proposition. This article...32 KB (4,623 words) - 00:50, 24 February 2024
- on a request from Talk:California Proposition 8 (2008). It matches the following masks: Talk:California Proposition 8/Archive <#> It was generated at...34 KB (34 words) - 10:29, 10 October 2022
- Proposition 8 is not the disambig page (which is Proposition 8 (disambiguation)); rather, Proposition 8 is a redirect. I can see why, If "Proposition...52 KB (6,304 words) - 10:29, 10 October 2022
- Prop 8. I couldn't find any information about what the supporters of Proposition 8 found about the event, except for a few responses from a pastor: [4]...50 KB (7,299 words) - 16:54, 29 January 2023
- just got rid of the long discussion of what Michael Savage thinks of Proposition 8. No doubt Jerry Brown has an opinion, not to mention Willie Brown,...179 KB (26,162 words) - 10:29, 10 October 2022
- Broken structure? 1.3 and 1.6. 171.96.242.55 16:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC) Fixed. There was a large part of the English section that was repeated- apparently
- important that a proposition be interesting than that it be true. This statement is almost a tautology. For the energy of operation of a proposition in an occasion
- pipelink. However, I haven't seen any independent confirmation of that proposition, so reader beware.→ (Also, as long as we're annotating, it's worth noting
- resolution is complete (see the second theorem under Properties of Propositional Resolution). The problem comes at the statement: First, notice that