Talk:ProQuest
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ProQuest article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Tense in lead
Having a new parent company hasn't seemed to have changed anything about its services or availability. It's still branded as ProQuest, still uses the proquest.com domain, and is still available through libraries (including the Wikipedia Library). It doesn't seem to make sense to word the lead as if it's a defunct company. I changed the tenses back to present. Schazjmd (talk) 16:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)