Talk:Primitive Technology
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 14 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Huw82.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:41, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
New logo
The channel has a new logo on it, as can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAL3JXZSzSm8AlZyD3nQdBA Perhaps it's time to change the logo on the article to reflect this change? Jurryaany (talk) 16:46, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jurryaany: You can upload a new version of File:Primitive Technology logo.png, or a new file, if you wish. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:38, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Hrodvarsson: Alright I'll do that then. I assume the same copyright status would apply? Jurryaany (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jurryaany: I am not an expert on copyright but I think so, unless otherwise stated by the creator. I have edited the non-free use rationale to be logo specific, which I imagine the original uploader intended but may have been unaware that such a template existed. Hrodvarsson (talk) 20:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Hrodvarsson: Alright I'll do that then. I assume the same copyright status would apply? Jurryaany (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
@Trivialist: Can you explain why you reverted the edits to the file? You did not leave an edit summary. Hrodvarsson (talk) 23:41, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I reverted it because it seemed like it should be uploaded as a new file, not overwriting an existing file. Trivialist (talk) 00:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Trivialist: I do not think there would be a benefit in having both the wordpress.com logo and the new logo in the article so the previous image would be deleted as non-free. Do you mind if I revert your reversion? The new logo appears to be the subject's current branding. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- That's fine; since they're both non-free images the old version would have been deleted anyway. Trivialist (talk) 01:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. I have done so. Hrodvarsson (talk) 01:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- That's fine; since they're both non-free images the old version would have been deleted anyway. Trivialist (talk) 01:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Trivialist: I do not think there would be a benefit in having both the wordpress.com logo and the new logo in the article so the previous image would be deleted as non-free. Do you mind if I revert your reversion? The new logo appears to be the subject's current branding. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Does a youtuber warrant a Wikipedia page?
Is he famous? Not a celebrity, not a historical figure. I don't understand why this YouTube channel has a page. 73.109.165.7 (talk) 03:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- The subject meets our Notability requirements as it has received significant coverage by Reliable Sources. --DanielRigal (talk) 03:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)