Talk:Plastic extrusion

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Polymers (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polymers, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PolymersWikipedia:WikiProject PolymersTemplate:WikiProject PolymersPolymers Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

I think that this article should be merged into the Extrusion article. And it should be referred to either as "Plastic Extrusion" or "Polymer Extrusion", but not "Plastics Extrusion". Engineers often refer to the process as "Plastic Extrusion". --PrecisionEx 17:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I made the article using the technical term "plastics". The word "plastic" is an adjective of a material's properties meaning "able to be molded". But, you may be right..."plastic" is the pop term used by most people. Polymer may be fine too...What about "Thermoplastic Extrusion"? Oh, and merge away if anyone wants to do it. Mikeeg555 09:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the title should be changed to either "plastic extrusion" or "polymer extrusion" because the current title is just awkward. Personally, I prefer "plastic extrusion". --Wizard191 (talk) 02:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Plastics Extrusion is the perfect term. Plastic Extrusion would be a ambiguous term, as as extrusion of all types involves plastic deformation. CoolMike (talk) 00:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concur. I found the present title a useful disambiguation. Sitzmark (talk) 17:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell?! We aren't supposed to cite anything we say?! God forbid we link to friggin information! Xtruderdood 01:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is forbidden is to link to a blatantly commercial site. What exactly was being cited there? Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 01:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The PROCESS section of this article makes the following statement; "This breaker plate and screen pack combination also eliminates the "rotational memory" of the molten plastic an[sic] creates instead, "longitudinal memory"."

While possibly a true statement, the terms and concepts of "rotational memory" and "longitudinal memory" need explanation. Nowhere in the article are these esoteric terms defined.

I would suggest a definition for these terms but have been unable to find one. I am truly curious and imagine anyone else reading this article might be as well.

Is there anyone in the Wikipedia community familiar with the terms, "rotational memory" and "longitudinal memory" in the context of the subject of this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcrodgers2 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Production processes.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]