Talk:Pictorialism
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Research and collaboration
- I'm currently conducting research for a substantial expansion of this article. If anyone has an interest in collaborating, please let me know. I expect the research and writing will take several weeks. Lexaxis7 (talk) 16:29, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- I've followed through and significantly expanded the original article. It's still in need of more details, especially for photographers who worked in Europe, Australia and Japan. Also, please add more images from lesser known pictoralists. Lexaxis7 (talk) 04:13, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
It seems to me that since the advent of digital techniques, almost all serious non-news photography has become pictorialist. This is not reflected, or even hinted at, in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.34.240.254 (talk) 07:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Unlinked shortened footnotes
The shortened footnotes do not link to the source citations. I will fix this by putting the source citations into citation templates & then using {{sfn}} or {{harvnb}} as appropriate Peaceray (talk) 19:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)