Search results
There is a page named "Talk:Peter Daempfle" on Wikipedia
- 118 bytes (0 words) - 15:42, 27 January 2024
- 'balancing' their views with those of biologist and popular science author Peter Daempfle [2] or the backcover of a 1932 (not 2002!) book by the physician and...33 KB (4,633 words) - 00:00, 15 February 2023
- pseudoscience with roots anchored in our science history is astrology." Peter Daempfle (2013). Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk:...250 KB (33,488 words) - 19:31, 29 January 2023
- Agree with both. Tgeorgescu (talk) 05:27, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Peter A. Daempfle (2013). Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk:...220 KB (27,538 words) - 18:00, 7 June 2022
- pseudoscience with roots anchored in our science history is astrology." Peter Daempfle (2013). Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk:...315 KB (36,785 words) - 18:07, 7 June 2022
- uses them to suggest common properties of pseudoscience purveyors. Daempfle, Peter (2013). Good science, bad science, pseudoscience, and just plain bunk :...149 KB (11,574 words) - 05:23, 30 April 2024