Talk:Overdrawn at the Memory Bank/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SL93 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• The lead - WNET-TV redirects to WNET. I don't think the -TV is needed.
  • Done. GamerPro64 01:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• The Cast section - The cast and roles should be referenced, though not through unreliable websites such as IMDb.
  • Have not been told to do that, even when I made two Featured Articles on films. GamerPro64 01:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fair point. Dang, a GA reviewer that I dealt with must have been very strict. SL93 (talk) 01:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• The Production and release section - WNET-TV should be WNET.
  • See above. GamerPro64 01:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• The Production and release section - laserdisc should be LaserDisc
  • Done. GamerPro64 01:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• References - Would you be able to clip the newspaper.com references so that others can read them?
  • I would but then I realized that I have a different username for Newspapers and would not want that to be revealed. GamerPro64 01:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Would you mind if I took care of that? I have an account. SL93 (talk) 01:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • Sure go ahead. GamerPro64 01:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Image - I'm not sure why the source website is listed under Source and under the licensing template.
  • Removed the superfluous link. GamerPro64 01:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you fixed the issues that were raised in the earlier peer review. SL93 (talk) 00:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I ran Earwig and everything checks out. I see that the issues were taken care of and I added the newspaper.com clippings.

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail: SL93 (talk) 03:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]