Talk:Omnibus spending bill
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Previous discussions without headers
I created a less US-centric page Omnibus bill. Omnibus spending bills are purely american as far as I know; should I merge the articles or just remove the category? UnHoly 17:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Why would you want to make a page that is about the US less US centric? That is beyond baffling. --[[User:]] ([[User talk:|talk]]) 03:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- Read that more carefully. Omnibus bills are not US centric. II | (t - c) 04:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Cromnibus
Shouldn't we discuss the 2014 Cromnibus?
- http://www.news.nom.co/laura-ingraham-blasts-republican-14108953-news/
- http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/392659/conservatives-float-cromnibus-bill-fight-obamas-executive-actions-joel-gehrke
- http://thehill.com/policy/finance/225783-what-is-the-cromnibus
- http://www.redstate.com/2014/12/04/boehner-scrambling-find-democrat-votes-cromnibus/
- 'CRomnibus' as nonce