Talk:Nonclassic eicosanoid
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
This term is without of relevance
I'm really suprised about this differenciation into eicosanoids and nonclassic eicosanoids. So far I know, currently it is not common to divide like this, the term "eicosanoids" is usual to describe all the nonclassic eicosanoids as well. The references in this article underlining the relevance of "nonclassic eicosanoids" as a term, are old. So, it is confusing to use this term in wikipedia here... I attended the conference "winter eicosanoids" this month in Baltimore, and I can't remember that the term "nonclassical eicosanoid" was mentioned, despite talking about this group of compounds. So if nobody can show the current relevance of this term, this articel should be deleted. Some indications that this term was sometimes mentioned in the past, might be content for the introduction of eicosanoid. Ok? --Max schwalbe (talk) 16:12, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Nonclassic eicosanoid/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.ToDo:
|
Last edited at 22:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 01:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Nonclassic eicosanoid page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Nonclassic eicosanoid" page.