Talk:Next Unit of Computing

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph of mobo photo / example PC be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that a computing diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Bluetooth#Bluetooth v4.0|Bluetooth 4.0]] The anchor (#Bluetooth v4.0) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

If "Max RAM" is supposed to mean the sum of the largest pluggable DIMMs (IMHO this would warrant a footnote/short explicit explanation), it might be interesting to not only list the official figures. Like other users of the NUC8i7HNK/NUC8i7HVK models for instance, I'm able to use 64GB of RAM (I have the former model and you find a number of reports online w.r.t. the latter model).

37.201.248.21 (talk) 19:06, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This Wikipedia article has a significant problem: there is hardly any info about *when* various things happened. For example, it says the third-generation products "were revealed in June 2013", but it gives no such info about the first-generation or second-generation products. Realute (talk) 12:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does it run anything other than MacOS X? MrDemeanour (talk) 08:05, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I have added a statement to the article. Axl ¤ [Talk] 11:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same as the 2014 request (above).

When were gen 1-3?

MBG02 (talk) 10:32, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good news, riddle solved. Article updated. --Danimations (talk) 02:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like article does not include the latest 2022 models 109.64.47.53 (talk) 08:13, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article has too much detail on each successive release of NUC hardware. It probably started off OK, but now with 12 generations where each release has a section listing every model variant the article is too long. Maybe the article could be split and a new 'Intel NUC generations' be created with the list of models. John a s (talk) 13:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/newsroom/news/intel-nuc-systems-agreement.html (and for the love of god could you all quit using the 20th century CAPTCHA? ) Also: https://www.pcworld.com/article/1989175/intel-kills-its-nuc-line-but-the-tiny-pc-will-live-on.html 75.162.62.239 (talk) 02:45, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]