This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
My addition of the Navy’s F/A-XX program under See Also was reverted because it apparently doesn’t fit the manual of style. I’m curious why that’s the case, as the two projects, while distinct programs of record, are related in terms of fielding timeframes and technology developments. Steve7c8 (talk) 00:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is a For note at the top of the article that says "US Navy's own distinct sixth-generation air superiority fighter program... see F/A-XX program." and there is also a sentence at the bottom of the Lead with a link too. However, it might be better to trim the Lead text and move the link to the See also section. -Fnlayson (talk) 00:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]