Talk:New York State Route 69

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  U.S. state highways   Locations  New York   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

New York State Route 69 was the New York State routes Article Improvement Drive collaboration for the week spanning from Sunday, February 17, 2008. For more details, see the New York State routes Article Improvement Drive archive.

Thank you for adding to what I introduced regarding upside-down signs. I remember seeing an upside-down sign in Mexico back when I was a student at SUNY Oswego; I think it's fixed 19 years later. The one sign I did see (and I drove the entire route from there to Utica) was when I was physically studying the northern terminus of NY 233, and I have a photo of that assembly. At some point, I intend to upload it (after I resize it for parameters). I drove NY 69 later in the day.

I'm just wondering if it's appropriate to reference the same thing on NY 96. I went to that route's article, and I didn't see any mention there of an upside-down sign. I don't know if 96 is really a "counterpart" of 69; I've only ever been briefly on a small part of it near Owego. For what it's worth, I've never seen (read: noticed) an upside-down NY 8 sign (I believe I've driven that entire route in segments) nor have I ever been on NY 88. My thought on it, anyway: If there's indeed a photographed upside-down sign that "looks" normal (cursory was a good choice of word), then it could be included and mentioned on that page directly, but I don't think it's necessarily "standard" to reference the same anomaly on other articles. Perhaps a separate companion article on oddities, errors, etc. could be produced for such a cross-reference, but I would rather spend my energies putting up new articles and adding to/otherwise contributing to the fine set of articles that we now have. Fwgoebel 04:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: NY 11 (1924) redirects here, so the article should include its history as well.

• 1924: modern 69 from Colosse to Rome became part of NY 11
  • 11 began in Oswego and ended in Utica - west of Colosse, its alignment is unclear; east of Rome, 11 used the pre-expressway routing of 49 (1924 NYT)
  • Truncated by 1926 to end at Colosse (1926 rmcn)
• 1927: 11 renumbered to 76 due to US 11 (1926-7 Blue Books)
• 1930: 76 broken up into 69 (west of Rome) and an extended 49 (Rome-Utica) (1930-1 Green Books)
  • modern 69 west to Mexico was unnumbered; east of Rome, it was part of 5S
• Between 1938 and 1947: NY 69 extended west to Mexico and east into Utica, overlapping 12C and 5A from Whitesboro to Utica (1938 GB, 1947 SNYDPW map)
• 1970: overlaps with 12C and 5A are eliminated (1970 log)
  • 12C essentially truncated to Whitesboro and Stittville, then renumbered 291
  • 69 truncated to 5A in Yorkville

--TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 19:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New York State Route 69. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060617222849/http://historical.maptech.com/getImage.cfm?fname=rome47se.jpg&state=NY to http://historical.maptech.com/getImage.cfm?fname=rome47se.jpg&state=NY

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]