Talk:Naflgar

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mythology This redirect is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles Norse history and culture Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Isn't this really the same ship as Naglfar, with either wrong or alternate spelling? --83.178.176.124 (talk) 13:19, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are right, looking at Google books, and support the merge to Naglfar Goldenrowley (talk) 17:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you both. Also, I've never seen it spelled "Naflgar". In fact, such a spelling wouldn't really make sense: if that were the real spelling, then Snorri could never have interpreted the name to mean "nail ferry". --Phatius McBluff (talk) 17:47, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to ask this one be deleted, as an obvious mispelling of Naglfar, a redirect should not exist and it adds nothing to the value. Goldenrowley (talk) 01:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good. That was my thought exactly when i found it a while ago. (I wonder if the source-book have it miss-spelled as well..) --83.178.21.177 (talk) 02:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]