Talk:Myogenic mechanism

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physiology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

The contents of the Bayliss effect page were merged into Myogenic mechanism on 18 December 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

• This page should be combined with Myogenic contraction. 204.133.176.94‎
• These two look like duplicates. Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: these do seem to be identical in common use. While it is true that there are mechanism generated by the muscle that are not the Bayliss effect, this seems to be the commonest intended meaning in the field of physiology. As for the direction of the merge, I suggest merging to the slightly more general myogenic mechanism. Klbrain (talk) 23:17, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all articles myogenic mechanism, myogenic contraction, and Bayliss effect to a more comprehensive usage myogenic response (which is now a redirect). Chhandama (talk) 03:31, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merging all three to the one location, headed with 'response', sounds like a good idea, because the nature of the response and its mechanism can then be discussed in one good article, rather than 3 incomplete articles. I'll propose a page move from Myogenic contraction (the oldest of the 3 articles) to Myogenic response, which should given the best preservation of the history for the final article. Klbrain (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge completed, but still awaiting move discussion, which seems to have moved from technical and opened up for discussion. Klbrain (talk) 13:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Klbrain: I've closed the RM linked to below, so that debate no longer stands in the way of this page merge. Happy New Year!  Paine Ellsworth  ^put'r there  16:15, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Myogenic contraction which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]