Talk:Mir EO-19/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Thank you for your review. Tyrol5 [Talk] 00:04, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Prose OK, MoS sufficiently complied with

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References check out, article suitably referenced, no obvious OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Could do with a mention of how Soyuz TM-21 had arrived at Mir

 Done Added mention/ref to address this concern.

1. Thanks for sorting this out

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   OK

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   OK

4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

5. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Just one point above to be addressed. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

   OK, all is in order, I am happy to list this now. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]