Talk:Microsoft Dynamics
Appearance
![]() | The contents of the Microsoft Dynamics page were merged into Microsoft Dynamics 365 on 19 March 2023 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Microsoft Dynamics redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on Fenruary 21, 2022. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Merge proposal
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- To merge and consolidate the tagged articles to Microsoft Dynamics 365, for reasons of short text and context, with some concerns over notability of individual product pages. This includes Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central,Microsoft Dynamics,Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance,Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales,Microsoft Dynamics AX. Klbrain (talk) 08:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
We currently have a smorgasbord of stubby articles about Microsoft Dynamics, most of which are spammy, based mainly on the MS website, and of limited quality. I think one good article about the suite would be much better than what we have. Stifle (talk) 09:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support, but @Stifle, I think they just need some TLC. I've consolidated the 4 disparate pages into Business Central which stands on it's own compared to the D365 suite in general. There's just lots of duplicate articles around previous product versions. I've been maintaining Dynamics 365 Business Central]. 121.200.20.20 (talk) 09:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support much more helpful to readers if they're trimmed and consolidated into a larger, better quality article Star Mississippi 15:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support - Per nom - DownTownRich (talk) 23:29, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose, but a different refactoring is needed. "Microsoft Dynamics" does not exist any more and should probably be moved to Microsoft Dynamics 365. For a little background, Microsoft went out and bought a bunch of different products and renamed them all "Microsoft Dynamics". They bought a product named "Navision" and renamed it "Microsoft Dynamics NAV". They bought a product named Axapta and renamed it "Microsoft Dynamics AX". They bought a product named Great Plains and renamed it "Microsoft Dynamics CP". You see the pattern. These are each completely unrelated products reaching unrelated markets with unrelated codebases. Since then, many of them have been combined and there are currently THREE actively maintained products - Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (formerly known as Microsoft Dynamics AX), Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (formerly known as Microsoft Dynamics NAV), and Microsoft Dynamics 365 (CRM). Yes, confusingly, if you just say "Microsoft Dynamics 365" by itself, that is CRM. "Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales" is CRM. "Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance" is F&O. --B (talk) 13:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Yes the product is currently named Microsoft Dynamics 365 move to that title should be appropriate. The way it is right now seems like these are current products using Microsoft Dynamics or did I miss any?
- Another question I have is Template:Microsoft Dynamics still relevant to have around or should we utilize See also sections and Template:About. DownTownRich (talk) 01:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Stifle can you list your merge request at Wikipedia:MERGEREQ to allow more editors to contribute and make input to this discussion. DownTownRich (talk) 01:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- That's backlogged by a year so I don't see a particular benefit to doing so. Stifle (talk) 09:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Stifle can you list your merge request at Wikipedia:MERGEREQ to allow more editors to contribute and make input to this discussion. DownTownRich (talk) 01:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Ghettoblaster (talk) 21:18, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support Quinnerwinner12 (talk) 08:52, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 10:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)