Talk:Mayor of Bristol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Previous titleholders

William II Canynges, Mrs S V Hare, Henry Chestre and Thomas Chester were apparently a few of the previous holders of the title Mayor(ess) of Bristol. There was also a titleholder in 1875. Presumably these were Lord Mayors. There may be scope for both articles (the recently created elected post and the historic one) with maybe a dab page at Mayor of Bristol instead. Alternatively both topics could be included in the one article. -- Trevj (talk) 12:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Historic mayors could be covered in History of local government in Bristol. Before 1899 they were just Mayors. The crucial difference is that the new post is directly elected by the people, the old post was elected by the councillors. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:51, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I suppose the incorrect inbound links could be dealt with by using a new redirect at Historic Mayor of Bristol (or better title) to History of local government in Bristol#Mayors. Does that sound sensible? In the longer term, my feeling is that Mayor of Bristol should be a dab page, with the current new content moved to Mayor of Bristol (elected). It seems unlikely that the current position will be the primary topic, when it has been a widely used term throughout history. -- Trevj (talk) 14:22, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I guess we should open this up to a wider Bristol WikiProject audience, perhaps after we get a main page DYK (if we get one)? BTW, Mrs S V Hare was just the consort of the mayor at the time, mayoress is just an honorary title for the consort (or daughter) of the mayor. If the mayor has been female then they are still referred to as mayor or Lord Mayor. The mayoress term has now been dropped in favour of deputy Lord Mayor. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination

Deletion of referenced relevant material

User:sport and politics made this revision removing material about the election result that I added earlier today, with the edit comment "too much detail". This material has direct relevance to the article and is referenced using a reliable source. I would like to discuss the concerns with this material and insert it again with whatever edits are required to address them. The edit comment doesn't give me much to go on; User:sport and politics presumably doesn't just mean that a demographic analysis of an election result is "too much detail" for an article about that election. SP-KP (talk) 18:41, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Powers

There needs to be a subsection clearly displaying what the powers of directly elected mayors in the UK are relative to their respective city councils. For instance, do they have veto power over council decision? Do they get to appoint department heads? Etc...--Criticalthinker (talk) 18:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mayor of Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mayor of Bristol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

rv George Ferguson detail moved here

A year ago a now-blocked user (for sockpuppetry) moved the mayoral detail from George Ferguson (politician) to here as the 2012–2016 section, leaving the George Ferguson (politician)#Mayor of Bristol section as 3 sentences, unbalanced for that article. I propose to move it back for the following reasons:

  • similar has not been done for the Marvin Rees detail, so the article is not consistent (or balanced)
  • it is opposite the approach used in Mayor of London where the detail is left in the people articles, with only major policies in the mayor article (NB I've not found any WP policy on the best approach)
  • it is excessively detailed for this article, but OK for the George Ferguson article (eg speeding ticket, six international flights, oil shale gas possibility at Avonmouth "hidden" until after election, the 6 para "Public image" section about him)
  • the 2012–2016 section (George Ferguson) section is about 75% of the articles written material now

Any objections to undoing this? Rwendland (talk) 12:39, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mayor_of_Bristol&oldid=1203931859"