Talk:Lunchbox (song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Homeostasis07 (talk · contribs) 22:33, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hi again Magic. There were a couple of minor issues with this one but, again, I figured it would be quicker just to fix them myself, rather than do the norm (write about it here). This was pretty much a good article anyway, save some MOS:ENDASH and MOS:BADHEAD fixes: [1]. Then I, stupidly, added some temporary repetition to the article before fixing it myself: [2]. Also some weasel-ish phrases, and some more repetition: [3], [4].

Aside from those [now resolved] issues, this was clearly another good article. Very informative. I had no idea the band were being touted by major labels so early (from After School Special, seriously? If it were Manson saying this, I'd call it hyperbole, but since it's being said by Daisy Berkowitz, I'm sure it's true—nice find!). The Manson Family Album#Background needs updating. I'm happy to promote this. Congratulations, @MagicatthemovieS: Homeostasis07 (talk) 23:49, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Damn. Neglected to mention that I did all the usual CopyVio and Image check stuff: all images are creative commons/public domain, except for the sound file, which is less than the 10% limit. Highest copy-vio reading (43-or-something %) was from the 1999 Rolling Stone article, and that was all from direct quotations, so no problems there.
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall: