Talk:Low-rise pants

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm dying for some pictures. --Tmh 22:04, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We have pictures now. Unfortunately the theme implies that the only people who wear them are pornographic actresses. --Juventas (talk) 02:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a picture, but it is deamed as "unrelated image" and thus removed.

--Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 02:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the following paragraph from the article for bad grammar, spelling, and general bad flow in the article. It used to be the first paragraph under the 1990s-2000s revival section. "a separate style from "hip huggers", Brazilian and Lowrise jeans where already being worn and stylized regularly by the Hispanic and Black Caribbean, and African American Communities for decades, especially in Brazil. Throughout the Hispanic, and Caribbean world many young girls and older women where regularly wearing ultra lowrise jeans. " 24.27.220.216 08:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Various portions of this article were taken from original research, yet the source was not properly cited. Should I just add them to the article  ? I ask because it was once listed as a source, but appear to have been improperly removed.

I seriously doubt that the average "rise" is 30 cm. This article needs to be checked. Constants (talk) 19:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is so US-biased it credited Britney Spears with popularising the bumster when Alexander McQueen developed them and was showing them five years earlier in 1996. The whole article is written from a US perspective only. I've added a bit about McQueen - with references, which the rest of the article lacks - but am not qualified to write more. It needs editors with a worldwide perspective, not just a US one. 86.150.103.254 (talk) 14:29, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We seem to have an edit war over whether to include an image of a male's whale tail in the article. Nymf and myself, Juventas, removed it. Peaboy and 218.186.18.231 (possibly the same person) reverted the removal.

There are several reasons I don't think it belongs: it's not representitive of the fact that the vast majority of wearers do not expose their underwear as part of the fashion, men who do expose their underwear as part of the fashion are much more likely to choose sagging (fashion), and the image quality is so poor it's not even clear that he's wearing jeans. There is a whale tail article, and it does not include this image (or any other of a male). --Juventas (talk) 01:42, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

u wear it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.255.53.107 (talk) 12:14, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The one with the girl dressed in white, nipples clearly visible through the top. I know WP:UNCENSORED, however, I am sure there is a less sexual picture, given that this isn't an article that needs to be sexual. Spiderone 19:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Low-rise pants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101123105310/http://designmuseum.org/design/alexander-mcqueen to http://designmuseum.org/design/alexander-mcqueen
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711093027/https://secure.gilroydispatch.com/lifestyles/194305-low-rise-jeans-unflattering-to-moms---thanks-a-lot-britney-spears to https://secure.gilroydispatch.com/lifestyles/194305-low-rise-jeans-unflattering-to-moms---thanks-a-lot-britney-spears

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]