This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
Requested move 1 September 2018
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose Belorussian romanization is not constant. Loev in books still refers to the region or town "The Yurovichy, Khoiniki, Bragin, Loev and Rechitsa regions were also studied." not to this film. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:39, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Kailash29792 here. This isn't the first time I encounter redirects to articles which don't mention that redirected name. If that Town is called "Loev" it should a) be mentioned in the article and b) supported by sources and if there aren't any sources then it shouldn't even redirect to it. --Gonnym (talk) 09:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support the featured article seems much more notable than the town. Hell, I'd even argue that a misspelled Love is more likely than that town. --Gonnym (talk) 09:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral: Here comes a thought - how about having a disambiguation page held at the basename of Loev? That way, anyone looking for the film, the town, or those who've misspelled "Love" can all be directed to the correct locations, instead of there being a primary topic. (Not sure about which name is used more often for the town though.) Paintspot Infez (talk) 01:07, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per pageviews [1], by which the film still has 207 daily views (despite being released in 2015) while the town has 4, making it a clear WP:PTOPIC. And this is not even a common alternative spelling of the town. This is a WP:TWODABS situation, and the dab page is neither necessary nor convenient for anyone. No such user (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.