Search results

says it's fake.a thing 07:30, 5 January 2006 (UTC) Erm, it's the Loch Ness Monster. By most reasonable yardsticks, all photographs are fakes. But I think...

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC) File:Hoaxed photo of the Loch Ness monster.jpg The introductory picture, copied here, is of low quality (out...

well used and can be sourced. Cryptid is a valid description of the Loch Ness Monster, no more no less. Do I think the beast exists? Hell no.... someone...

this page be called 'Loch_ness' to conform to wikipedia's way of only capitalising the first letter of a page? Alternatively Loch_ness could redirect to...

Density of Monsters in Loch Ness W. Scheider, P. Wallis Limnology and Oceanography, Vol. 18, No. 2 (Mar., 1973), pp. 343 The Loch Ness Monster-Limnology...

can not be evidence that the Loch Ness Monster, or the Tooth Fairy, for that matter, does not exist. Hi There 00:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC) Whoa, someone...

monster's existence that are not sourced are original research and should not be included. WLU 19:36, 16 June 2007 (UTC) To find out more about Loch Ness...

Usually it's just "Loch Ness Monster" though. And I don't mean people say "Loch Ness sea monster," but people do call it a "sea monster." Adam Bishop 17:05...

to this section. The result of the proposal was moved. Compare to Loch Ness Monster and most members of ‹The template Cat is being considered for merging...

the Loch Ness Monster in this article lists it as being a hoax, while the caption for the same picture in the article for the Loch Ness Monster itself...

legend of the Loch Ness Monster." Nonsense. Who believes this? Tales of the Loch Ness Monster pre-date the release of King Kong. Tales of monsters in the lake...

(loosely based on the Celtic water horse) which later become the fabled Loch Ness Monster, Emily Watson, Ben Chaplin, and David Morrissey." According to this...

Legend of the Lake Champlain Monster," Skeptical Inquirer, July 2003. The article on the Loch Ness Monster states: "The loch simply does not have enough...

could be deleted without any real harm. Naturally, the famous lake monsters (Loch Ness) should stay. Mateinsixtynine (talk) 05:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Why...

18:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC) nope, sorry. 1. thats supposidly of Nessie (Loch Ness Monster (sorry to insult your intelligence))2. Its actually an elephants trunk...

proposed as an explanation for the Loch Ness Monster (by creating odd-lookign ripples that people mistake for a monster). Our article mentions them, but...

worth mentioning. Should we remove all references of the Loch Ness Monster from the Loch Ness article too? I added the reference in a way that complies...

every monster is the loch-ness monster. --66.169.105.182 (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2010 (UTC) Today's progress in redrawing my picture of Tullimonstrum. [1] What...

and noticing that it is mentioned on the "Loch Ness Monster in Popular Culture" page that the Loch Ness monster "could be based on Nessie." Perhaps if someone...

Hugh Gray does not have any mention whatever in the article on the Loch Ness Monster. It may have been confused with photographs that were taken in 1934...