Talk:List of micronation currencies
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 September 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
There is plenty of information on this topic throughout the internet. I started a history section, beginning with Lundy, and if there are editors who want to help improve this recently created article, here are two sites which they will find useful:
Onecanadasquarebishopsgate 15:24, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Inclusions
In my opinion this list should not include fantasy currencies - ie, currencies for which no tangible coins or banknotes have ever been produced. Accordingly, I propose removing the fantasy inclusions currently listed - unless someone has particular objections. --Gene_poole (talk) 23:35, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Which currencies would you like to see removed? Onecanadasquarebishopsgate 16:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Elsanor, Kemetia, Sabotage, Tycho, Voodice - these are all internet fantasies as far as I can tell. They do not exist in the real world and have not produced coins, banknotes or indeed any other tangible product.
- Coral Sea, Ladonia, NSK, North Dumpling - these have a more tenous existence in the real world (apart from NSK which is an artist's collective) - but they have still not produced either coins or banknotes.
- In both cases we can't list any of them here because their "currencies" do not actually exist in any tangible form. --Gene_poole (talk) 22:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- True - plus the list could almost be endless if we included internet fantasies with their (mostly) non-existent currencies. Onecanadasquarebishopsgate 10:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- What do you think of the idea of adding a picture of either one coin or banknote, as a representative example, beside each entry on the list? Is it practical? --Gene_poole (talk) 01:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Absolutely. I would place it right of the flag column. However, we would need to decide on a system for what coin to add, otherwise there could be an endless debate of opinion. Once we have decided on a reasonable system we can add it to the micronation convention. Onecanadasquarebishopsgate 08:24, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think the matter of which coin/banknote picture we decide to include in this list is likely to generate any controversy. Whichever one we pick in each case, it is merely a representative example. In many cases there are only 2-3 to choose from in any case. --Gene_poole (talk) 07:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- If nobody oppose, I will add pictures from my collection.(I hope that Gene Poole oppose and will add coins from his huge collection) --Yopie 12:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think the matter of which coin/banknote picture we decide to include in this list is likely to generate any controversy. Whichever one we pick in each case, it is merely a representative example. In many cases there are only 2-3 to choose from in any case. --Gene_poole (talk) 07:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think that unless someone adds more pictures of coins soon, we should get rid of the image column. There are only three rows with images. --Micromaster (talk) (contributions) 19:20, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. Nearly a decade later, and we're down to 1. This sort of thing is always best dealt with in the articles themselves. I'll remove the column now. Bromley86 (talk) 00:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
I know of a currency (which exists physically) which could be included in this list. Would I need to have some proof of its physical existance prior to listing it on here? Izax143 (talk) 15:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:NFA Flag.jpg
The image Image:NFA Flag.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
- File:Lagoanflag.jpg
- File:Hutt river province currency 01.jpg
- File:ForvikFlag.svg
- File:1994SX$0.25SilverObverse.gif
- File:10SolidiNoteFront.gif
- Image:Westartica Flag.jpg
- Image:VikeslandFlag.jpg
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Republic of Free state?
Does the Republic of Free state actually exist? Could not find anything, most searches are about Free State (province), a province of South Africa. This is the only page that can be found with the name on info column. 93.106.190.6 (talk) 21:51, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- I could find nothing either. Removed. RichardOSmith (talk) 09:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Hutt River
This Micornation has its own banknotes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Hutt_River
Maybe also the Jason Islands may be mentioned: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banknotes_of_the_Jason_Islands
Column review
I'm looking at cutting out some of the columns to make the table easier to verify, without losing any really useful information. I've ralready removed the Image column, per the (somewhat temporally spaced-out) discussion above. The columns, with my proposals:
Micronation. Keep, duh.
Flag. Keep. Normally I'd say this sort of thing is best dealt with in the article, but (a) a bit of colour breaks up the wall of text nature of a table, and (b) it might make the entries slightly more easily recognised.
Name. Keep.
Symbol. Remove. It doesn't really add anything to the article. No one is going to be searching for the "currencies" based on their symbols, and they're pretty hard to easily confirm from this article. Best dealt with in the individual micronation's article.
Value. Remove. As above, really. As these "currencies" are, in reality, almost entirely fictitious, it's not like we really need to know here what notional value they've been assigned.
Type. Keep. This serves as a quick visual check that the currency should be listed (given that the consensus is currently that only tangible currencies, with real coins or banknotes, should be listed.
Any comments? Bromley86 (talk) 00:29, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)