This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
There must surely be thousands or more such applications. What are the inclusion criteria? Do we want to be listing things that don't have Wikipedia articles? Morwen - Talk 12:31, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We should follow general Wikipedia practice for articles like this and only list things that are notable by Wikipedia standards. Basically significant coverage by at least two reliable sources. In practice this means the app should get an article first (passing notability requirements) and then add the link here. I'm going to start pruning this article soon. SQGibbon (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Refreshing the list
While a good number of the listed apps are still active and relevant to the article, some are ancient and/or no longer functional. For example 'wikiHow' hasn't received an update in 12 years. 94.173.137.65 (talk) 20:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We should not remove entries simply because they are not currently maintained.
Development or distribution status of any particular package is irrelevant. If it executed on iOS, has it's own article, or WP:RS demonstrating notability: it goes in the list. (Same way we don't remove entries from List of operating systems simply because they're no longer developed.)
One is free to note an entry is unmaintained, however. -- dsprc[talk] 20:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]