This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
I think that the claim that the term was coined so recently is clearly erroneous, and I would suggest that its broader use needs to be acknowledged, even while keeping the focus on this particular use of the term.Wbehun (talk) 04:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. For instance, Randy Barnett has used the term to describe a sort of blending of legal positivism and natural law theory. See here, which was published in 1978, whereas Olufemi Taiwo's book appears to have been published originally in 1996. Orthzar (talk) 19:48, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]