Talk:Karamokho Alfa
![]() | Karamokho Alfa has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 29, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Karamokho Alfa appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 March 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Karamokho Alfa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 17:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: QatarStarsLeague (talk)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 17:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
![]() Check for WP:LAYOUT:
|
![]() Check for WP:WTW:
Check for WP:MOSFICT:
|
None
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section:
Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
good (Thorough check on Google.)
![]() Check for WP:RS:
|
![]() Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:
|
- c. No original research:
Done
![]()
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
b. Focused:
![]() |
---|
![]()
|
4: Neutral
![]() 4. Fair representation without bias:
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 France license) & (PD)
Images:
![]() |
---|
![]() 6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
|
As per the above checklist, the issues identified are:
The lead does not provide an accessible overview and does not give relative emphasis.The lead should be expanded.
- I believe I have address this adequately. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 15:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks
--Seabuckthorn ♥ 07:09, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks
- I believe I have address this adequately. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 15:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
This article is a very promising GA nominee. I’m glad to see your work here. All the best, --Seabuckthorn ♥ 11:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 07:09, 29 January 2014 (UTC)