Talk:John Worboys
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Worboys article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
Unfortunately, John Worboys is one of the most notable serial rapists in UK history. An article on him and his horrific crimes is definitely warranted. He was convicted yesterday. Fences and windows (talk) 16:13, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Worth noting?
I stumbled upon this extract of information about John Worboys 'But, rather shockingly, the Mail's sleuths have discovered that "Terry" - who "performed his gyrations to the theme tune from the ITV series Minder" - was in fact the professional name of John Worboys, who earlier this year was convicted of raping several women who had been passengers in his London taxi.'
http://heresycorner.blogspot.com/2009/06/woman-with-past.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrpops2ko (talk • contribs) 15:43, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Worboys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604030810/http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/whereilive/southlondon/wandsworthnews/4169187.Black_cab_rape_suspect_is__oddball_/ to http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/whereilive/southlondon/wandsworthnews/4169187.Black_cab_rape_suspect_is__oddball_/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Classist victimizing language
"professional women" ? If these were "unprofessional men" what would that mean? Zezen (talk) 07:48, 11 July 2019 (UTC) You are right! I will remove the word "professional"--2601:1C0:CB01:2660:78F2:2153:816F:27D0 (talk) 03:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)--2601:1C0:CB01:2660:78F2:2153:816F:27D0 (talk) 03:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)--2601:1C0:CB01:2660:78F2:2153:816F:27D0 (talk) 03:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
I decided to remove this sentence: His prescription for sleeping problems allowed him to stockpile temazepam, a known date rape drug, which he later used on his female victims for two reasons: 1) I don't think it should be here as an example for bad people 2) I don't think it has any encyclopedic importance and harm the article (by the way, I also doubt the importance of the article itself as I don't see "rapists" as important people in the history of humankind, even given the fact they are serial rapists. --2601:1C0:CB01:2660:78F2:2153:816F:27D0 (talk) 03:17, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
- Re. the importance of the article:
- he was a notably prolific serial rapist. His name is very widely known, at least in the UK. People want to get background, and many will hope to find it on Wikipedia.
- Re. "sedatives": people seem to be very coy about what he used. Apparently this article once named a particular benzodiazepine, but I've just watched a show that (while maintaining coyness) strongly suggested he developed a cocktail over the course of a series of experiments.
- Wikipedia shouldn't censor itself.
- Therefore I propose to revert this change. [Edit] and see if I can find some more detail; my guess is that this kind of information is in the public domain.
John Derek Radford
What were the circumstances and background that allowed him to legally change his name? Surely not for religious reasons, or to claim an aristocratic title? Nuttyskin (talk) 20:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)