Talk:Japanese aircraft carrier Jun'yō/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 21:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC) Will review this one today, too. —Ed!^(talk) 21:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One dab link needs fixing.
- Done.
Time formats should be 00:00 (and the local time zone might be helpful, too.)
- Military time doesn't use the colon. The time zones are generally unknown.
- I've been going off of MOS:TIME. I can't find anything in WP:MILMOS addressing time. —Ed!^(talk) 20:04, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - See Military time.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:23, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Pinged MILHIST here with only one response. Reviewers have been stringent on my own reviews about it in the past (see point 11). Sorry to be so draconian about this but it affects multiple articles (and mine as well). MILHIST should address this eventually, but as of now the only concrete policy on it comes from MOSTIME. —Ed!^(talk) 13:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:47, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Overlinking of Solomon Islands, Caroline Islands, Battle of Midway.
- Oh my, yes.
Philippine Sea, graph 4: "On her return voyage, the ship was twice attacked unsuccessfully by American submarines." - any idea which two submarines?
- Added.
Same graph: "She was hit by three torpedoes, killing 19 men, that flooded several compartments." - the split is confusing, but if you just move the middle phrase back, it sounds like the flooding killed the men. Should be reworded some other way.
- Done.
What was the fate of the ship bell? Is it still around? Should be specified.
- It's still there, check the cite for the link.
  - Clarified this in the text. —Ed!^(talk) 20:04, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Chesneau ref is unused in the text.
- Moved into further reading.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:23, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will check back soon. —Ed!^(talk) 17:38, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:23, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]