Talk:Jack Burkman

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. LGBTQ+ studies This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles Pennsylvania Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not sure if he qualifies since the whole entry is really based on an incident that was just planned for someone who played on the practice squad for a month.--CharlesDeMint (talk) 21:25, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"A serial killer is likely behind the murder of North Carolina Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich, according to forensic-psychology students and instructors, who spent three months investigating the homicide. Those researchers, who volunteer at the Profiling Project..." "The Profiling Project is funded by GOP lobbyist Jack Burkman, who last September announced he was offering a $100,000 reward for information into Rich’s death."[1] --Guy Macon (talk) 22:34, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be all over the news today. Jack Burkman was just accused of trying to drum up false accusations of sexual misconduct as a way of discrediting Mueller's special investigation. [2]. The link isn't the only news story reporting on it. Seems to be credible, and probably encycopedia-worthy for this person. --MarchHare (talk) 17:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does "credibility" imply that something is true or happened, as opposed to "it seems possible"? (AltheaCase (talk) 03:08, 8 August 2023 (UTC))[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Remove entry for October 30th. It's a lie and completely false. Information to backup. JayFenneman (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Nothing is or can be a lie there because all allegations are properly attributed. It's widely covered, and you shouldn't engage in original research with your "information to backup". Read WP:NOTADVOCACY for why Wikipedia does not engage in "believing all women" or similar such nonsense when the "woman" doesn't even exist. wumbolo ^^^ 18:58, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This should probably be included. Volunteer Marek 20:49, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I ask someone with good knowledge & authority (better than mine) to split this section into smaller, more discrete chunks.

Also, I was the one who added the event announced Oct 11, 2019. In the published document there is at present a box around my addition. If anyone knows how to remove this box, please do so!

Thanks Wikipedia! Alpine Joy (talk) 01:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]