Talk:Innocent passage

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

International relations: Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as Low-importance). Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Are submarines permitted to remain submerged during innocent transit? --40.142.140.74 (talk) 03:26, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. Added text. Викидим (talk) 20:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Transit passage and innocent passage seem to be two terms discussing the same topic, and cited sources talk about both. "Innocent" is obviously a condition under which transit passage is allowed, but it's not like discussion of innocent passage is separate from discussion of transit passage that isn't innocent, because the point is to explain the rules. I don't care which term is used, but given how short the articles are and that they are talking about the same thing, I think they should be merged. Is "transit passage" the more general term? -- Beland (talk) 22:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]