Talk:Helen Toner

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 November 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Australia Low‑importance Helen Toner is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

my gut says she is notable. Seems to me, for this article to evolve to a good place, it should continue to fill in proper usual details about her work, her life, etc. It's off to a good start I think.

Currently, the zeitgeist info about her is heavily hinging on recent drama and a news story that is very fresh. That's significant, but the article shouldn't revolve around that. skakEL 14:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]