Talk:Great Seto Bridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The name of the bridge

Is this bridge really referred to as the Seto-Ohashi Bridge in English? Doesn't the 大橋 (Ō-hashi) part of 瀬戸大橋 (Seto Ō-hashi) already mean bridge? Hence I would've thought referring to it as the Seto-Ohashi Bridge would be like saying Mt Fujiyama or ATM machine. Stephen Mok 18:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, it is like saying "ATM Machine" ("Mt Fujiyama" is even weirder, since it's "Fujisan" in Japanese). Not sure whether anyone calls it that or not, but if they do, it's reasonable for the article to make reference to it. The article does use "Great Seto Bridge" as the primary name. adamrice 19:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was about to make the same comment but since you've already mentioned it I'll go back to sipping my chai tea latte with milk. If nobody can find a ref for this misnomer, let's remove it. JIMp talk·cont 04:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Here a ref for it
JIMp talk·cont 04:41, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements

This is really a beautiful bridge. The views are beautiful when the fog and clouds do not close in. The "Trivia" section should be renamed "Bridge Stats" or something similar. Or maybe moved into a info box. See: Akashi-Kaikyō Bridge The use of a map would be very helpful. By comparing how other bridge articles are done, this article can be improved. This can be a great article. Good start! Please continue to work on it. Enfermero (talk) 20:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

These six named bridges have their own stubby little articles. Each of these articles is a copy-and-paste of each other with the details changed. Why do we need this? Let's just merge them all here. JIMp talk·cont 05:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. JIMp talk·cont 00:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Seto Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Scientists" more likely engineers

Scientists began investigations shortly after

They were more likely to have been engineers: civil, structural and geotechnical engineers. Jono from oz (talk) 08:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]