Talk:Grace Panvini

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles

Women in Red: #1day1woman (2024)

This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that petite soprano Grace Panvini stood ~~4 foot 11 3/4 inches~~ 4 ft 11.75 in (151.77 cm) tall; a height which one reviewer described as an asset for appearing youthful on stage?

Source: For her height of 4 foot 11 3/4 inches: "INSTRUCTORS TEACH STUDENTS TO LIFT THEIR VOICES". South Florida Sun Sentinel. December 3, 1996.

For the review calling her short stature an asset for appearing youthful: Alice Eversman (August 12, 1942). "Rigoletto Brings Singers to Water Gate". Washington Evening Star. p. 45.

- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Zhang Ziyu

Created by 4meter4 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 84 past nominations.

4meter4 (talk) 21:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Not a review, but if we are to go with this angle, I would suggest including a metric conversion given how most of the world do not use customary units. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing... Flibirigit (talk) 15:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Article created on July 5 and nominated one day later. Length and sourcing are adequate. The article appears neutral in tone and plagiarism was detected. AGF on both sources for the hook: Height is cited to a source which require a subscription, and no online link was provided for the Washington Evening Star article. Hook is otherwirse properly cited and reasonable interesting to a broad audience. I applied {{convert}} to the hook and the article for univeral recognition of height. No image is used in this nomination, and the image used in the article has an appropriate fair use license. QPQ requirement is complete. Flibirigit (talk) 15:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]