Talk:Failbook
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accusation?
I've deleted the paragraph stating the similarity to another, longer-running site. This article is about Failbook, not similar websites. If the purpose of the reference to Lamebook is a thinly-veiled accusation of plagiarism, then it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. If Lamebook's people have made this accusation publicly, and/or Failbook's people have denied it, I'm sure there's plenty of citeable evidence online ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 13:41, 7 April 2013 (UTC)