Talk:FIP World Heavyweight Championship
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FIP World Heavyweight Championship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | FIP World Heavyweight Championship is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Not World Heavyweight Status
This article has been incorrectly named "FIP World Heavyweight Championship" when it hasn't been defended outside of the United States. Just because someone calls it a World Heavyweight Championship doesn't mean it is. Mr. C.C. 05:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- I moved the page to FIP Heavyweight Championship. Mr. C.C. 16:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- From the article itself: "Following Roderick Strong's successfully defence of the title against PAC in Liverpool, England on March 3, 2007, FIP has renamed the title the "Full Impact Pro World Heavyweight Championship"." If this is true, I suggest we move the article to include its World status. WikiFew 03:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh please, just because some magazine doesn't confer its phoney baloney "world title status" on it doesn't change the name of the belt. Should we move CZW World Heavyweight Championship while we're at it? Hell, how about ROH World Championship? Nosleep1234 11:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- First off, get over yourself. Secondly, where did I ever state anything about Pro Wrestling Illustrated? One defense outside of North America doesn't give it official World Heavyweight Championship status. It should be defended outside of North America or at least the United States on a regular basis to hold World Heavyweight Championship status. Mr. C.C. 18:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
You get over yourself. Look at this page. What's the name of the top title? Nosleep1234 11:01, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- That doesn't mean it has World Heavyweight Championship status. Any fed can call their main title a World Heavyweight Championship. Look at that title history and you will see that it was defended once outside of the United States. Most of the time it has been defended in and around Florida. Mr. C.C. 08:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Actually if it's called the FIP World Heavyweight Championship by FIP and ROH, then that is what it should be called since that is its given name, regardless of status. Linknumbers (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on FIP World Heavyweight Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090812125033/http://www.fullimpactpro.com/results/results2004.htm to http://www.fullimpactpro.com/results/results2004.htm
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6G45q8Lpk?url=http://www.fullimpactpro.com/headlines.htm to http://www.fullimpactpro.com/headlines.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101006160130/http://fullimpactpro.com/history/heavyweighthistory.htm to http://www.fullimpactpro.com/history/heavyweighthistory.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)