Talk:Excipient
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Requested move
Excipient → Pharmaceutical excipient – to distinguish information as and to start seperate page called Cosmetic Excipient
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
- Neutral, but if you move it at least follow the naming conventions and make the second word lower-case. --Angr/tɔk tə mi 08:24, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Discussion
- Add any additional comments
I'm definetly in favor of piping. I.e. excipient (pharmaceutics). Peter Isotalo 14:17, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
- The redlinks would appear to indicate that this move doesn't require sysop intervention. And, meanwhile, there's nothing impeding the creation of the other article at either Excipient (cosmetics) or Cosmetic excipient. –Hajor 01:04, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Excipient. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://apps.who.int/prequal/trainingresources/pq_pres/TrainingZA-April07/Excipients.ppt
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140809100407/http://www.ipapharma.org/epharmatimes/Mar2013/ to http://www.ipapharma.org/epharmatimes/Mar2013/#65
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC)