Talk:Electronics in rock music

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Removal of final paragraph

How is this section not relevant to this article?--SabreBD (talk) 13:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is content taken verbatim from the Techno article.Please see here to clarify what the concerns are. Needs to be rewritten, and ideally showing relevance to the article topic. Semitransgenic talk. 14:11, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see the problem. There is no fork if the text is relevant to both articles, if that is what you are pointing to.--SabreBD (talk) 15:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
CC BY-SA applies here, it's a terms of use issue, I created that content for the techno article. Second issue is I disagree with the premise of this article and would rather not have this material reused in this fashion (and so avoid contributing to the synthesis that is taking place here). Semitransgenic talk. 15:22, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, could you give me a direct link please.--SabreBD (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Direct link to what exactly? the guideline link is above. Semitransgenic talk. 16:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I need a paragraph or a quote please, as I do not see which bit of that page covers your view.--SabreBD (talk) 17:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
under WP:NOATT "Content rewritten in one's own words does not need attribution. However, duplicating material by other contributors that is sufficiently creative to be copyrightable under US law (as the governing law for Wikipedia), requires attribution." Whichever is easier. Semitransgenic talk. 17:09, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK thanks. It may take me a little time to look at this properly.--SabreBD (talk) 06:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 May 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved (to Electronics in rock music) as clear consensus has been established. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 07:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Electronic rock → Electronics and rock music (or Electronics in rock music) – To clarify the function and scope of this article, which has a long history of being misconstrued as a genre (see above discussions). Ilovetopaint (talk) 17:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support move to "Electronics in rock music" for reasons stated by nominator, although I am open to other suggestions for a title.--SabreBD (talk) 18:05, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah, Electronics in rock music is at least better than the current title, if not ideal. No such user (talk) 15:04, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The proposed title is a more accurate description of the article's contents. —  AjaxSmack  21:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Electronics in rock music is more accurate. — JFG talk 11:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 21 external links on Electronics in rock music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2010s content

@91.34.30.13: Please read WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH (emphasis added): "[Original research] includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding OR, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and directly support the material being presented.

Here is an example of the material you added: "Dance Music acts have incorporated elements of Rock and Metal ... A key release to give popularity to the sound is Korn's 2011 release The Path of Totality." The cited source states that the album "combines nu-metal elements with the electronic dance genre dubstep". It does not state that the album was popular, influential, innovative, or otherwise significant in any capacity.

In order to add content that says, for instance, "dance acts in the 2010s draw on the influence of rock and metal," you have to cite a source that explicitly makes that observation. ---Ilovetopaint (talk) 12:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Electronics_in_rock_music&oldid=1229245014"